Mad World! Mad Kings! Mad Composition! : William Shakespeare – “King John”


ABOVE: “When is that pizza going to get here?”

When picking a Shakespeare play to teach or produce, the Histories seem to sink to the bottom of the raffle box. “The Comedies are funnier, the Tragedies more powerful,” goes the general feeling. They are as a rule, stodgier, more bound to the demands of a historical account, but in “The Life and Death of King John,” the Bastard Faulconbridge gets to deliver some knee-slapping digs, and the death of cowardly King John is unexpectedly mournful:

“What surety of the world, what hope, what stay/ When this was now a King, and now is clay?” 

“King John,” one of two Shakespeare plays entirely in verse, was written sometime between 1587 and 1596, and is chronologically the first in Shakespeare’s unofficial, majestic saga of the British monarchy. It covers the unloved reign of Richard Coeur-de-Lion’s less liony brother, which concluded in 1216. King John matters to history as the ruler so distrusted that feudal barons forced the Magna Carta on him; he is perhaps best known in pop culture as Robin Hood’s thumb-sucking antagonist in the Disney movie, which as far as petty usurpers go, is not a bad ending.

ABOVE: “I command you to do the Hamster Dance!”

 The plot concerns the struggle between England and France over succession in the form of John’s nephew, Arthur (not the Holy Grail dude.) Arthur’s mother Constance allies herself with France; proud, petty John tells off  the French (and the Pope, whom he calls a meddling Italian priest.) Then John captures young Arthur, and coldly orders a conflicted chamberlain, Hubert, to poke the kid’s innocent eyes out with a hot stick. In one of Shakespeare’s moments of right-for-the-tear-ducts sentimentalism, Hubert breaks down crying before being able to complete the grim gouging task.

ABOVE: “Awww, don’t cry Hubert, I’m sure you’ll get to poke plenty of eyes out in the future!”

Historians knows nothing of the fate of the real Arthur. Did he die in prison? Shakespeare happily fills in the gaps with too many odd plot twists (cursed be history!) But the final two acts are incongruous with what came before, and ask from us an undue sympathy for a King who’s into kid-killing. Not many would argue that “King John” makes the Top 20 in the Shakespeare catalogue. It’s still Shakespeare; the Bastard Faulconbridge is a lively character; the whole thing is bejeweled with moments of wit and beauty. Even the common phrase “to gild the lily” is “King John” botched: 

To gild refined gold, to paint the lily, to throw a perfume on the violet, to smooth the ice, or add another hue unto the rainbow, or with taper-light to seek the beauteous eye of heaven to garnish, is wasteful and ridiculous excess.

My favorite casual description here is:

“The day shall not be up so soon as I/To try the fair adventure of tomorrow.”

“The Fair Adventure of Tomorrow”! How awesome is THAT?

RATING: COOL!!! (In the Shakespearian scale.)


4 thoughts on “Mad World! Mad Kings! Mad Composition! : William Shakespeare – “King John”

  1. Pingback: Pretty Little Neck : Maurice Druon – “The Strangled Queen” | THE PAGEAHOLIC

  2. Pingback: Signifying Nothing: William Shakespeare (and Joss Whedon) – “Much Ado About Nothing” | THE PAGEAHOLIC

  3. Pingback: Sad Stories of the Deaths of Kings : William Shakespeare – “Richard II” | THE PAGEAHOLIC

  4. Pingback: Being Double – William Shakespeare : “The Comedy of Errors” (Re-read) | THE PAGEAHOLIC

Say What You Need To Say

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s